The Mcdonalds Coffee Lawsuit Fact And Fiction
The judicial system has been strengthened overtime because of the ability it has to become fair. The courts have to make sure that there are no disputes and that is why they tend to solve all of the case types that are brought before them. The most sensitive court cases are the ones that involve the personal injury. Because such cases have no direct penalties, there are some times where the losers in such are able to feel that there was some unfairness. One such case that the people have been talking about for so long is one that involved a leading coffee company. The people read or hear about the coffee lawsuit where there is a woman who got to grow rich from compensation.
The compensation that was that heavy originated from the case about the burns that came from coffee bought at a company’s’ outlet spilling on her lap. The argument that the lady was holding the coffee on her laps as she drove and therefore all of that compensation was unfair. However, before judging, we should be able to get the facts of the whole case right and why the company chose to pay.
The company having a lot of complaints about burns suffered by some other clients is the first fact that there is. The problem was with the coffee that the company made because even as the clients’ negligence hard some part in it, there were a lot of similar cases and that made their chances so slim.
There was a time that the company was able to admit to their coffee being too hot. The company served their coffee at a standard heat of 180 degrees compared to the market standard at 135 degrees. For the company, admitting liability made it hard for them and that is because such heat is known to cause deep burns.
The client should also be able to consider the fact that the lady was able to get some serious burns. The client was able to receive medication for some time and also was admitted in hospital and because of the medical records, that shows it was serious.
The other fact that should not be sidelined is the fact that the lady was old and was with her grandson at the time of the accident. First of all, she was 79 and not middle aged as it was painted. The driver was the grandson as contrary to the beliefs that people have. The personal injury lawyer that was chosen in this case was competent and argued with the facts and that is why they won the case.